Grading Categories
LLED offers some courses that are graded and some that are pass/fail (e.g., those in the Bachelor of Education program). The categories below are valid only for undergraduate students taking graded courses.
Graduate students seeking information on grading categories should refer to Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies statements on grading practices. (A mark below 68 is a failing grade for doctoral students in any class, graduate or undergraduate, and a mark below 59 is a failing grade for magistral students. Therefore, a mark in the “C” range is not deemed “adequate,” per the descriptors below, for graduate students. Consult your instructor and the course syllabus for information about grading practices in individual courses.)
Work of outstanding quality
| A+ | 90–100 |
| A | 85–89 |
| A− | 80–84 |
Exemplary work that demonstrates excellent comprehension of the subject, exceptional thoughtfulness and an inquiring mind. Consistently applies a high level of critical scrutiny to texts and discussions, with a willingness to explore ideas beyond what has been presented, to question and evaluate critically one’s own thinking and learning processes. Shows a high degree of personal engagement with the topic and makes connections that are deep and insightful. Frequently articulates innovative ideas based on a broad background; is creative and thought-provoking. Consistently integrates broad orientations towards language and learning.
Work of good quality with no major weaknesses
| B+ | 76–79 |
| B | 72–75 |
| B− | 68–71 |
Strong work that demonstrates in-depth comprehension of the subject. Frequently articulates original, critical insights. Thoughtful use of existing knowledge in the subject. Reveals a willingness to engage actively in the learning experiences of the course in the work and to make personal and meaningful connections. Evidence of critical reflection, questioning and creativity.
Adequate work
| C+ | 64–67 |
| C | 60–63 |
| C− | 55–59 |
Satisfactory work for undergraduate students in most UBC courses; no major weaknesses in comprehension of the subject are evident. Shows few original, critical insights. Background knowledge is adequate. Evidence of personal involvement in the learning experiences of the course and the making of connections. Meets all course objectives and requirements. Needs further development in the areas of critical reflection, inquiry and creativity. Note that marks in the “C” range are not deemed adequate for graduate students at UBC. This grading scale does not apply for graduate students.
Minimally adequate work; barely at a passing level
D 50 – 54
Some flaws or deficits in understanding. Unable to integrate broad orientations towards language and learning. Marks in this range are barely passing for undergraduate students and are in the failing range for all graduate students.
Failing work
F 0 – 49
Inadequate for successful completion of the course or submitted beyond the final date of acceptance. Reveals an inadequate or lack of engagement with learning experiences in the course and an unwillingness or inability to participate appropriately.